<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Http on Asadbek Kurbonov</title><link>/tags/http/</link><description>Recent content in Http on Asadbek Kurbonov</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 10:30:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/tags/http/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>mojo_net: Network stack in Mojo and http benchmark against rust and go</title><link>/posts/mojo-net-networking-for-mojo/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 10:30:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>/posts/mojo-net-networking-for-mojo/</guid><description>&lt;p>Trigger Warning: AI!&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I have been watching Mojo language development by Modular, a Qualcomm company for years. This August they released 1.0
stable version and open sourced it later. The BDFL is Chris Lattner, the creator of LLVM and Swift language.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Mojo feels like a child of rust and python. On one hand it looks like a python syntax, but it has rust like
internals. Its memory model is like rust, it is low level, compiles to machine code and very fast.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>